| Are Our High Tech
Gadgets Putting Us All in Danger?
|
We all know that technology can be used for both good
and evil: the splitting of the atom led to both nuclear
power plants and nuclear bombs; GPS can be used to find
lost children or by dictatorial governments to keep tabs
on their citizens; RFID can be used to improve the
efficiency of stocking a store's inventory or to invade
our privacy, and so forth. The Internet can be used to
keep in touch with faraway family members and expand our
knowledge base, or it can be used by pedophiles to prey
on children. These are all well-known dangers of
technology.
But what about the more hidden
dangers that come with the proliferation of
technological gadgets that we enjoy in today's world?
You might not see that cell phone or MP3 player in your
pocket as a threat to anyone, but can it be putting you
- and even others - in danger every day?
We're
not talking about the long-debated question of whether
radiation from mobile phones causes brain cancer, or
whether the anti-social lyrics of some popular songs are
influencing young people to engage in anti-social
behavior, although those are worthy topics for the
medical community and psychologists/sociologists to
investigate. What we're talking about today is the
possibility that our tech toys may be placing us in
imminent physical danger, by distracting us from the
world around us.
A few weeks ago, in this
newsletter we discussed the trend toward high tech
automobiles. Many cars today have built-in GPS, audio
systems that are fancier than ever, DVD players built
into headrests, and there are even full fledged computer
consoles available that go into the dashboard, and
companies are gearing up to offer mobile wi-fi
connections designed to keep you on the Internet while
you're driving. All of this is very cool - but several
readers wrote to bring up safety concerns about having
all this entertainment equipment in vehicles.
Peter K. put it this way: "Remember now, you're driving
a 3000 pound car at 60 mph. Put another way, that's 88
feet every second! It has been measured; taking your
eyes off the road to change the radio station and back
again comes to almost 3 seconds. Doing the math, that's
264 feet. More than the length of 3 1/2 semi's. That's a
24 lane intersection! For the GPS navigation display,
even more. Try and scroll through your cell phone's
numbers looking for a name to call. You may end up never
making that call. At that speed, no seatbelt or air bag
will save you."
Of course, manufacturers of
in-car DVD players market them as being for the use of
the passengers - but I've passed vehicles on the road at
night in which you could see a movie playing, and the
driver was the sole occupant. In many jurisdictions,
having the screen visible to the driver's seat is
against the law, but if the screen is movable, that can
be difficult to enforce unless the driver is caught in
the act.
And it is possible to carry the concept
of having no distractions available too far. How many of
us have had the experience of using the car radio or
even a cell phone conversation to keep us awake and
alert during a long, dull drive?
No one deals
with more distractions while driving than the police
themselves. Back in my law enforcement days, I found one
of the most challenging aspects of the job to be routine
patrol, where you're expected to talk on the radio, look
for suspicious behavior on the streets and still somehow
drive safely. These days, most police cars also include
mobile display terminals (MDTs), for an added
distraction. Yes, in some jurisdictions, police work in
pairs and the officer in the passenger seat operates the
equipment, but in most smaller departments and many
large, budget-challenged ones, two-officer cars is a
luxury that's unaffordable. Multitasking while driving
is a way of life.
A National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration study a few years ago estimated
that 25% of police-reported accidents involve some form
of distraction. But interestingly, cell phones and other
high tech devices accounted for only a small percentage
of those accidents. Many of the distractions that cause
accidents are very low tech: talking to passengers,
tending to children, adjusting the controls (windshield
wipers, lights, air conditioning, mirrors), eating,
smoking, swatting insects, and so forth. Still, it makes
sense that having more and more devices in the car, even
those that aid in driving such as GPS units, provide
more potential for distraction.
And it's not just
in the car that the distraction of tech toys can pose a
danger. I see people all the time now, walking down the
street, in the mall, on airplanes and in other public
places, whose glazed eyes give away the fact that
they're oblivious to what's going on around them even
before you notice the tell-tale earbud. Whether
listening to music, audio books or their Bluetooth
phones, they obviously aren't paying attention to
anything but the "bug" in their ears. Sometimes I wonder
how many folks have walked out in front of traffic
because of this. And maybe it's just my old cop
training, but if a terrorist takes over my plane or
someone is robbing the store, I don't want to be the
last to know.
What do you think? Is the
proliferation of high tech toys making the roads and
other public places more dangerous for us all? Or can
we, with the proper training, learn to effectively
multitask while driving without creating a safety
hazard? Have you ever been guilty of making cell phone
calls, watching DVDs or fiddling with the sound system
while driving? Should there be laws against such
activities? If so, should there also be laws against
non-high- tech distractions, such as crying babies,
chatty passengers and drive-through restaurants that
encourage behind-the-wheel eating? Let us know your
opinions and experiences at
feedback@wxpnews.com.
|
|
| |